<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Media? To Whom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.offcampusmedia.com/2009/12/23/new-media-to-who/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.offcampusmedia.com/2009/12/23/new-media-to-who/</link>
	<description>Marketing to College Students</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:43:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Chiulli</title>
		<link>http://www.offcampusmedia.com/2009/12/23/new-media-to-who/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Chiulli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offcampusmedia.com/?p=472#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Barbara: Those stories really illustrate how media has evolved. Help us remember that media is dynamic and has been for sometime. No sign that it will change either. And I agree its important that we consider historical context during our analysis. Without doubt, allot can be learned.

Gail: And communication channel is also a total pain to type! Just kidding. But I do see your point. If the ultimate goal of language is to clearly communicate/explain/articulate then perhaps familiar terms are best?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara: Those stories really illustrate how media has evolved. Help us remember that media is dynamic and has been for sometime. No sign that it will change either. And I agree its important that we consider historical context during our analysis. Without doubt, allot can be learned.</p>
<p>Gail: And communication channel is also a total pain to type! Just kidding. But I do see your point. If the ultimate goal of language is to clearly communicate/explain/articulate then perhaps familiar terms are best?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

